First, a male juror told the judge that he was still in pain from his recent hernia operation and that he also would need to go back to work (to tend to his own business) at the end of each day in court. [CRY OFF]
So the judge dismissed him from the jury.
Second, immediately after that a female juror told the judge that she had changed his travel plans to South Korea but because of this her travel agent had charged her extra for rearranging her schedule. [COMPLAINT]
So the judge dismissed her and the entire jury, and sarcastically told the woman: "You can now go to Korea."
All this took 90 minutes, which definitely cost far more than the cost of a little trip to South Korea. Have these jurors no shame?
One-week delay for Hui, Kwoks corruption trial as judge discharges entire jury (SCMP; paywall)
PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 28 May, 2014, 1:44pm
Stuart Lau firstname.lastname@example.org
The most high-profile corruption trial Hong Kong has ever seen was today put on hold for one week after the nine-member jury was discharged.
The adjournment came as two members of the jury, chosen on Monday, told the judge of reasons hindering them from sitting on the panel of nine people.
It marks a delay in the case against former chief secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan, who allegedly received HK$34 million in cash and other inducements from the heads of Sun Hung Kai Properties (SHKP) – tycoon brothers Thomas and Raymond Kwok – and others.
What the law says:
The law relating to the discharging of jurors is found in the Jury Ordinance. Section 25 provides that a court may at any time discharge a juror if it considers this to be in the interests of justice or the interests of the juror.
Section 24 permits a nine member jury to be reduced to eight, seven, six, or five members in this way. If the jury has the full nine members, at least seven of them must agree on the verdict.
No less than six jurors must agree on the verdict if the jury is reduced to eight members. Should the jury have less than eight members, at least five of them must agree on a verdict.
The smallest jury possible under the Ordinance is one of five members. In such a case, they must all agree on the verdict.
The issues with the jury began when a male juror said he was still in pain from double hernia surgery in March and that he needed to return to his one-man business operation.
The jury was sent out of the courtroom for a discussion, then came back after some minutes.
High Court Justice Mr Andrew Macrae told the male juror: “I am reluctantly persuaded that I will have to exempt you.”
But then a businesswoman also raised a complaint, saying she planned to go to South Korea, but had to reschedule her flight at a cost.
The jury was sent out again, and upon returning, the judge informed the remaining eight that their services would no longer be needed.
“Thank you for your patience. All of you will have to be discharged,” they were told.
Addressing the businesswoman directly, he added: “This means you can go to Korea," which prompted laughter in the courtroom.
The judge also suggested that David Perry QC, for the prosecution, would now have time to take a trip before the trial resumes next Wednesday – a joking reference to Monday’s drama in which a number of prospective jurors refused to serve, citing summer travel arrangements to South Korea.
The move was in response to concerns raised by some of the defendants’ legal counsel, one of whom said a verdict reached by a partial jury would not be convincing to the public, given the great public and political resonance of the case.
Another legal representative expressed worry over the expected duration of the trial. Macrae had told the jury on Monday it could last until October, based on the original schedule.
The Jury Ordinance requires five members, at the very least, in a jury.
In this court sketch, the judge deliberates just moments before he decided to adjourn the trial until next week. Illustration: Adolfo Arranz
Hui, 66, faces eight charges related to bribery and misconduct in public office. Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong, 62, co-chairman of SHKP, faces one charge of conspiracy to offer an advantage to Hui and two counts of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office.
Raymond Kwok Ping-luen, 61, also co-chairman, faces four charges, including one count of furnishing false information with Hui. Thomas Chan Kui-yuen, executive director of SHKP, and former Hong Kong stock exchange official Francis Kwan Hung-sang each face two charges.
All plead not guilty.
TIMELINE: Jury discharged at Hong Kong's most high profile corruption trial (SCMP; paywall)
PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 28 May, 2014, 9:42am
Stuart Lau, Patsy Moy, Enoch Yiu, Danny Lee
The prosecution in the most high profile graft trial in Hong Kong's history was today put on hold after issues with the jury forced its dismissal. The city's former number two official and the co-chairmen of one of the world's major real estate firms are in the dock. Former chief secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan is accused of receiving HK$34 million in bribes and other financial inducements from billionaire brothers Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong and Raymond Kwok Ping-luen, the chairmen of Sun Hung Kai Properties (SHKP).
11.30am: The case has been adjourned.
11.20am: "Thank you for your patience. Your services will no longer be required," the judge tells the eight jury members. Addressing the woman with the flight booked, he adds: "You can now go to Korea."
11.15am: The panel of eight jurors are summoned back to the courtroom and they are all discharged, throwing the process into disarray. All are told to leave the court.
10.55am: Scenes in court are becoming farcical as another juror raises objections. She tells the judge she had changed the date of a flight to South Korea to serve on the jury, but now the travel agent wants to charge her for switching the flight. The eight remaining jurors are again sent out.
10.48am: After some discussions about the juror's medical condition and his working hours - the juror in question had earlier also mentioned he had to get to work after the trial had wrapped up for the day - the judge has dismissed him. It is unclear whether the case can now continue.
10.38am: Discussions over. The jury, consisting of four women and five men, is summoned back to the courtroom. The nine were chosen from a 150-strong pool of potential candidates, in a selection process on Monday that took around two hours.
10.18am: There's a delay to the opening as a juror tells the judge he is still in pain following a double-hernia operation in March. The entire jury is sent out of the courtroom while the matter is discussed. The discussions cannot be reported for legal reasons.
Prosecutor David Perry QC arrives in court. Photo: SCMP 10.11am: The defendants, all dressed in suits and ties, sit in the glass-encased dock in two rows. In the front is Thomas Kwok, flanked by brother Raymond and Rafael Hui, while the co-defendants are seated behind.
10.04am: Mr Justice Andrew Macrae arrives at 10am on the dot. The nine-member jury files in a short time later, with the juror who fell sick yesterday, detaining the opening of the prosecution for half a day, back to good health. It will be a long slog for everyone involved, as the case is penned in to run possibly until October.
9.47am: Prosecutor David Perry QC enters the courtroom. The prosecution is expected to open its case against the five defendants - brothers Raymond Kwok Ping-luen and Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong; Thomas Chan Kui-yuen, former chief secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan, and executive director of SHKP and former Hong Kong Stock Exchange official Francis Kwan Hung-sang - at 10am.
Reporters and cameramen crowd around the doors of Hong Kong's High Court, ahead of proceedings. Photo: SCMP9.40am: With tempers finally calmed scores of reporters and members of the public file up to the fifth floor of the courthouse, as lawyers carrying bundles of documents enter the courtroom. Raymond Kwok stops in front of photographers to allow them to take pictures before entering the building.
9.30am: Good morning and welcome to the SCMP's live coverage of Hong Kong's biggest ever graft trial. Colourful scenes at the courthouse ahead of the opening of the prosecution, with journalists clamouring for spots in the High Court. Media outlets had started to queue for seats as early as 7pm Tuesday night. This morning tempers flared among journalists as one was caught trying to remove pre-registered names from the media seating plan.